The Left's Big Lie: Terry McAuliffe
and His Election Conspiracies
Oct 19, 2021 | Stu Does
America
-(FS MCAULIFFES STAR NYT QUOTE 1)
“Mr. McAuliffe's star seems so bright that it has fueled speculation that when his
term ends officially next March, he might run for office, possibly for governor
of…”
-(FS MCAULIFFES STAR NYT QUOTE 2)
“...New York, where he originally comes from, or Florida, where his father-in-law,
Richard Swann, is a major Democratic fund-raiser. Clearly relishing such talk, Mr.
McAuliffe concedes an interest in ''executive'' office, but says he is leaving open
his options.”
-(FS MCAULIFFE WILL SAY ANYTHING NYT QUOTE)
“...an adviser to Mr. Kerry said about Mr. McAuliffe's fund-raising prowess and
his willingness to be a lightning rod: 'Terry is a very valuable player. Terry will
say anything.’”
-(SOT MCAULIFFE TELLS BIG LIE 2000) - 0:44
-(SOT MCAULIFFE TELLS BIG LIE 2004) - 0:14
-(FS NATL REVIEW MCAULIFFE QUOTE 1)
“But in 2004, did he tell the crazies in his party to move on? No, he commissioned
a ‘Comprehensive Investigative Study on Election Practices in Ohio’ to ‘address
the legitimate questions and concerns that have been raised in Ohio’ including ‘anomalies
in the reported results as compared with exit polls, historical data, and reported
anomalies within counties and precincts and whether the touch-screen machines and
tabulating systems functioned properly.’”
-(FS NATL REVIEW MCAULIFFE QUOTE 2)
“‘We owe it’ to the voters, McAuliffe said in December 2004, to ‘understand what
happened’ and ‘conduct a thorough investigation into various election administration
issues that arose in the state of Ohio in the 2004 election.’”
-(FS NATL REVIEW MCAULIFFE QUOTE 3)
“To that end, he pledged to hire ‘a political scientist expert in quantitative analysis;
an expert or experts in the design of computer hardware and software systems; an
expert in voting systems and machines; an investigator with forensic expertise;
and a pollster to survey voters who cast provisional ballots and to conduct other
original survey research as needed.’ All this to ‘investigate’ a state George W.
Bush carried by more than 118,000 votes.”
-(OTS PRESIDENTIAL VOTE MARGINS 1)
2004 118k (OH)
-(OTS PRESIDENTIAL VOTE MARGINS 2)
2016 78k (WI, MI, PA)
-(OTS PRESIDENTIAL VOTE MARGINS 3)
2020 43k (GA, WI, AZ)
-(FS UMICH VOTING MACHINE STUDY COVER PAGE)
-(FS UMICH VOTING MACHINE STUDY QUOTE 1)
“Current DRE voting systems, in addition to being extremely expensive to procure
and maintain, are vulnerable to fraud.”
-(FS UMICH VOTING MACHINE STUDY QUOTE 2)
“While there is no reliable evidence of actual fraud in the use of these machines
in Ohio in 2004, our expert advises that DRE (touchscreen) machines are not sufficiently
safeguarded against fraud…”
-(FS UMICH VOTING MACHINE STUDY QUOTE 3)
“The statistical study of precinct-level data does not suggest the occurrence of
widespread fraud that systematically misallocated votes from Kerry to Bush.”
-(FS UMICH VOTING MACHINE STUDY QUOTE 4A)
It’s entirely possible that a DRE voter could vote for one candidate, which would
be displayed on screen, while an entirely different candidate could be recorded
internally as having received that vote. If such an error occurred, neither the
voter nor any election official would be able to undo the damage after the fact…”
-(FS UMICH VOTING MACHINE STUDY QUOTE 4B)
“...If such an error occurred systematically, it could swing the outcome of an election.
And, if the faulty software was deliberately placed in the machine, it could even
be programmed to modify itself to eliminate any traces of its having been present.
If such fraud were occurring, it would not be visible to poll workers or election
observers.”
-(SOT MCAULIFFE DOUBLES DOWN ON BIG LIE) - 0:40
-(SOT MCAULIFFE CONCERNED ABOUT VOTING MACHINES) - 0:40